Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis for thyroid cancer incidence risk among populations residing in proximity to nuclear power plants

From: The risk of thyroid cancer in relation to residential proximity to nuclear power plants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lead author (year)

Study design

Country/ region

Number of facilities

Study period

Exposed population

Unexposed (reference) population

Age group

Sample size (cases)

Effect measure

Exposure measurement

Male/ Female

Relative Risk and 95% CI

Bazyka (2012) [26]

Ecological

Ukraine

3 NPPs

2003—2008

Observed Communities near NPPs Pivdennoukrainsk, Energodar, Netishyn

Ukraine

n.s

129,845 (49)

SIR

Area (community) comparison

Total

1.23 (0.89—1.58)

Boice (2009) [44]

Ecological

USA

1 NPP

1990—2004

Two counties Armstrong and Westmoreland in Western Pennsylvania

Six comparison counties (Clarion, Clearfield, Somerset, Beaver, Washington, Erie)

n.s

(433)

RR

Area (county) comparison

Total

0.88 (0.78—0.99)

(102)

Male

0.86 (0.68—1.09)

(331)

Female

0.88 (0.77—1.01)

Bunch (2014) [65]

Birth cohort

United Kingdom

1 NPPs

1950 and 2006; 1963—2006

Cumbrian births between 1950 and 2006

National incidence for 1971—2006 using person-years analysis

0—57

338,119 (89)

SIR

Seascale ward as at 1981 + Allerdale and Copeland county districts excluding Seascale + Remainder of Cumbria

Totala

0.82 (0.45 – 1.50)

Demoury (2020) [54]

Ecological

Belgium

2 NPPs (Doel and Tihage)

2000—2014

Observed around buffer

Walloon Region for Tihange and Flemish population for Doel

All ages

n.s (33)

RR

0—5 kma

Total

0.81 (0.69 – 0.95)

n.s (68)

0—20 kma

0.82 (0.78 – 0.86)

Desbiolles (2017) [33]

Ecological

France

7 NPPs

1995—2011

Exposed to 1 NPP site

Municipalities with no NPP or other nuclear installations within 20 km of their town hall

 > 15

445,935 (671)

RR

0 – 20 km

Totala

0.97 (0.75 – 1.26)

(186)

Male

1.12 (0.95—1.32)

(485)

Female

0.86 (0.77—0.96)

Gulis (1998) [64]

Ecological

Slovakia (Trnava)

1 NPP

1986–1995

District of Trnava

European population

n.s

3456 (1)

SIR

 ≤ 5 km

Female

1.51 (0.00—3.03)

112,092 (22)

0 – 20 kma

1.05 (0.83 – 1.34)

75,618 (5)

10 – 15 km

Male

1.64 (0.89 – 2.39)

Kim (2018) [47]

Cohort

South Korea

4 NPPs

1992—2006

Residing within 5 km and 0 – 30 km of an NPPs

Residing > 30 km of an NPP

 > 20

36,176 (54)

HR

 ≤ 5 km

Total

3.20 (1.73—5.93)

n.s (166)

0—30 kma

2.91 (1.86- 4.53)

(10)

 ≤ 5 km

Male

3.38 (0.92—12.39)

(35)

0—30 kma

3.73 (1.49 – 9.28)

(44)

 ≤ 5 km

Female

3.15 (1.56—6.34)

(131)

0—30 kma

2.69 (1.62 – 4.47)

Lane (2013) [39]

Ecological

Canada

3 NPPs

1990—2008

Those who lived within 25 km of 3 NPPs in Ontario

Ontario general population

All ages

1,984,500 (4591)

SIR

0 – 25 km

Totala

1.11 (0.87 – 1.43)

 

Malea

1.41 (1.32—1.51)

Femalea

1.06 (0.79—1.42)

Salerno (2016) [63]

Ecological

Italy

1 NPP

2002—2010

Observed in Trino municipality where former NPP was located

Turin City

All ages

ns

SIR

Area (community) comparison

Female

1.86 (1.06—2.66)

Wang (2016) [66]

Ecological

Taiwan

3 NPPs

1979—2003

Plant-vicinity (< = 14.2)

Non-plant-vicinity (> 22.8)

n.s

ns

RR

 ≤ 14.2 km

Total

0.79 (0.12 -5.28)

Zadnik (2008) [46]

Ecological

Slovenia

1 NPP and 1 nuclear waste repository site

1984–2003 (Krško NPP started operations in 1984)

Spodnjeposavska statistical region

Slovenia

n.s

ns

SIR

Area (region) comparison

Female

0.94 (0.67 – 1.28)

  1. aCombined weighted summary estimate
  2. n.s not specified