Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of CHD cases and controls in the NHS and HPFS studies1

From: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, apolipoproteins and the risk of coronary heart disease in US men and women

 

case (n = 101)

control (n = 101)

P-values2

Age (yr)a

56.7 ± 7.9

56.8 ± 7.8

-

Female (%)a

50.5

50.5

-

Smoking, %a

 Past

32.7

33.6

-

 Current

13.8

12.9

-

BMI (kg/m2)

26.2 ± 4.7

25.7 ± 3.8

0.48

Physical activity (MET/wk)

26.6 ± 37.8

25.6 ± 23.9

0.83

Alcohol intake (g/d)

2.4 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 1.0

0.83

AHEI

46.8 ± 9.4

48.3 ± 10.5

0.27

Fasting, %

62.3

58.6

0.04

Using of cholesterol lowering medication, %

8.9

3.0

 < 0.001

Aspirin use, %

39.6

36.6

0.02

Family history of MI, %

44.6

18.8

0.001

History of hypercholesterolemia, %

56.6

35.7

0.47

History of hypertension, %

47.6

24.9

0.01

History of diabetes, %

14.0

2.0

 < 0.001

PFAS (ng/mL)

Total PFOS

36.8 ± 19.8

34.0 ± 15.0

0.26

brPFOS

9.5 ± 4.8

8.6 ± 4.0

0.13

nPFOS

27.2 ± 15.5

25.4 ± 11.5

0.33

PFHxS

4.7 ± 5.1

6.2 ± 13.9

0.32

PFOA

5.6 ± 4.7

5.7 ± 5.8

0.96

PFNA

0.8 ± 0.5

0.9 ± 0.6

0.74

PFDA

0.2 ± 0.2

0.3 ± 0.2

0.89

Blood lipids (mg/dL)

 TC

223.0 ± 40.7

207.6 ± 34.6

0.005

 TG

172.4 ± 120.3

129.5 ± 76.3

0.004

 HDL-C

47.1 ± 16.2

52.1 ± 13.5

0.02

 LDL-C

137.4 ± 37.4

124.5 ± 31.2

0.01

CRP (mg/L)

0.4 ± 0.5

0.3 ± 0.5

0.18

  1. Abbreviations: CHD Coronary heart disease, BMI Body mass index, METs-hr/wk Metabolic equivalent-hours per week, AHEI Alternative healthy eating index, MI Myocardial infarction, TC Total cholesterol, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, TG Triglycerides, PFOS Perfluorooctane sulfonate, brPFOS Branched PFOS, nPFOS Linear PFOS, PFOA Perfluorooctanoate, PFHxS Perfluorohexanesulfonate, PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid, PFDA Perfluorodecanoic acid, CRP C-reactive protein
  2. Data are mean ± SD or percentage (%)
  3. 1Data on women are from the Nurses’ Health Study, and data on men are from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study
  4. 2P-values for the difference between cases and controls were determined by paired student’s t-test for variables expressed as means ± SD, and by the McNemar chi-square test for variables expressed as percentages
  5. aMatching factors